WebJun 14, 2024 · Under the PPA, PPC is the Regulatory Authority that: issues the port operating license to Penang Port. sets and monitors the performance standards of the … WebCare that a reasonable person would use in looking after his own chattels of the same kind in the same circumstances (Port Swettenham) A bailment for reward is when the bailment is part of the service (e. bag storage as part of the train trip) (hire of custody) ... (Port Swettenham Authority) If the cause is unknown (e. theft), the bailee will ...
Port Swettenham Authority v T W Wu and Co (M) Sdn Bhd: PC 19 …
WebMoreover, in Port Swettenham Authority v T W Wu & Co (M) Sdn Bhd...been held to be an authority on vicarious liability generally and not confined to cases of bailment. The case … WebPort Swettenham Authority v TW Wu. bailee took no steps to prove taken reasonable care, clearly negligent act and onus was on D, D was liable ... storage of furniture is deemed to be a service for which there is no authority to sub-bail. James Buchanan & Co v Hay's Transport Services - 3rd party and carrier were associated companies, sub ... mountain drive near me
Port Privatisation (port klang).pptx - UNIVERSITI KUALA...
WebJan 27, 2014 · Port Swettenham Authority v. TW Wu and Co (M) Sdn Bhd [1975] 1 LNS 124 FC (diikuti) Teoh Guat Looi v. Ng Hong Guan [1998] 4 CLJ 416 CA (dirujuk) Perundangan yang dirujuk: Contracts Act 1950, ss. 101, 102, 104 Criminal Procedure Code, s. 112 Kaunsel: Bagi pihak plaintif - Tony CH Chong; T/n Sidek Teoh Wong & Dennis Webn10 See, for example, the case of Port Swettenham Authority v TW Wu & Co (M) Sdn Bhd[1978] 2 MLJ 137 (PC); Jackson's Malaya Bhd v Penang Port Commission [1973] 2 MLJ 27. n11 [1995] 1 MLJ 811. n12 [1995] 2 MLJ 100. n13 Ibid at p 103. n14 Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd [1980] AC 827. WebPort Swettenham Authority v TW Wu and Co (1979) AC 580 This case considered the issue of bailment and whether or not a bailee of goods bore the onus of proof in relation to their … mountain drinking glasses