WebThe case includes the affirmatives inherency, harms, significance, and solvency Case attacks. Negatives can initiate a variety of arguments to attack the affirmative. These include attacks on the affirmatives inherency, harms, significance, and solvency. Any arguments that directly refute claims made in the 1AC are case attacks. Case list. WebInherency The stock issue that identifies a probability for future harm, based in the embeddedness of the harm within the status quo and predicting that absent affirmative …
INTRO TO CX DEBATE - University Interscholastic League
WebThe HARM issue addresses existing evil in our world. We would not act to implement change unless we are convinced that there is a cost to not acting. Harm requires advocates to address the importance and compelling nature of existing problems. Inherency a. WebHarm, Inherency, Solvency, Plan ! 1NC: Present the Negative Attack ! Traditionally attacked the 1AC ! More recently: Topicality, Disads, Case ! 2AC: Re-Defends Against 1NC ! Follows 1NC point-by-point ! 2NC: Answer 2AC positions ! Divide positions with the 1NR (division of labor) 3 Rebuttal Speaker Burdens ... employees national insurance thresholds
Debate Flashcards Chegg.com
Web“Inherency” is the third test. Proposals must be focused upon improving the situation because of a flawed system that cannot control its promulgation of significant harm/s. Solvency: Identification of a problem – proving its significant and systemic harmful impact upon society is insufficient to proving the merits of an alternative proposal. WebThree common types of inherency are: Structural inherency: Laws or other barriers to the implementation of the plan or causes of harms Attitudinal inherency: Beliefs or attitudes which prevent the implementation of the plan or causing harms WebSep 29, 2010 · If your inherency points “link” to a harm (Russian relations hurting –> our soldiers will die), then your solvency points “link” to both advantages and disadvantages (Ratifying new START will cause better relations –> so we won’t go to war [or from the negative: so our NATO allies won’t trust us anymore!]). employees new tax code